nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200930-100438-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200930s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200930-100438-0 doi eng 342 23 Idriz, Narin Author aut A ‘Complete’ System of Legal Remedies? The EU-Turkey Deal as a Litmus Test Idriz, Narin Verfassungsblog 2020-09-30 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In practice, Member States and the EU increasingly rely on informal instruments for cooperation with third countries, especially in the area of migration control, with important implications for the rule of law. The choice for informality becomes particularly problematic when it affects the legal situation of irregular migrants, including refugees because it makes it very difficult for them to challenge these instruments in front of EU courts. This blog post explores the effects of EU’s recourse to informality on the judicial protection of the rights of irregular migrants by using the EU-Turkey Statement as an example. The Statement, also known as the EU-Turkey ‘deal’, raises serious doubts as to whether the EU legal order indeed provides for the promised ‘complete’ system of legal remedies. funded by the government CC BY-SA 4.0 EU-Turkey Deal informalisation legal remedy refugees Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/a-complete-system-of-legal-remedies/ raw object