Examining the UK’s Legal Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic Grogan, Joelle Author aut Text xx# 2021 Verfassungsblog 2021-05-07 eng

electronic resource

remote

Computermedien

Online-Ressource

On 16 December 2020, despite rising rates of infection and the widely predicted ‘second wave’ already impacting neighbouring European countries, Prime Minister Boris Johnson mocked the opposition for wanting to ‘cancel Christmas’ by reintroducing nationwide lockdown restrictions. Three days later, a nationwide lockdown in England was introduced (inadvertently mimicking the March 2020 commitment that London had ‘zero prospect’ of lockdown, four days before it was enforced). The lockdown – closing schools, universities and a majority of businesses which were deemed non-essential and prohibiting gatherings of more than two people outdoors from separate households – continued until 12 April 2021 when restrictions began to be lessened through a phased ‘roadmap out of lockdown’. Such political hyperbole by the executive and lax response, followed by sudden U-turn policy making (‘essay crisis’ governance) and severely restrictive measures, have characterised much of the response to the pandemic in the UK. CC BY-SA 4.0 Grogan, Joelle funded by the government COVID 19 United Kingdom 342 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/a-government-ungoverned/ 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20210507-111655-0 210507 10.17176/20210507-111655-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)