nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200716-235718-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200716s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200716-235718-0 doi eng 342 23 Churches, Genna Author aut A Groundhog Day in Brussels Schrems II and International Data Transfers Churches, Genna Verfassungsblog 2020-07-16 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier 16 July 2020 feels like Groundhog Day in Brussels. For those, who did not see the famous film Groundhog Day, it’s about reliving the same experience again and again until the main protagonist gets ‘why’. Similarly, the much anticipated Schrems II decision, delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) today, is almost a ‘reliving’ of its earlier decision in Schrems I. How many ‘Schrems’ are we going to have — and who is the protagonist that needs to get ‘why’? Let’s look at it all in more detail. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 data protection privacy shield Safe Harbor Schrems II Zalnieriute, Monika Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/a-groundhog-day-in-bruessels/ raw object