nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20211117-202225-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 211117s2021||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20211117-202225-0 doi eng 342 23 Selejan-Gutan, Bianca Author aut A Tale of Primacy, part III Game of Courts Selejan-Gutan, Bianca Verfassungsblog 2021-11-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The third act, but not the end, of the ongoing „game of Courts” between the Romanian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice came on 9 November 2021, with a letter by the Romanian Constitutional Court to assist the acting minister of justice with a reply to the EU Commission's concern about primacy of EU law. I will not comment again on the arguments, already developed by the Constitutional Court in its decision, but I will try to emphasize, through relevant quotes, the disregard of the rule of law requirements stated in the CJEU judgment as well as the absence of the capacity of a true dialogue with the European Court. funded by the government CC BY-SA 4.0 European Court of Justice primacy Romanian Constitutional Court Rule of Law Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/a-tale-of-primacy-part-iii/ raw object