nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20181005-150152-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 150312s2015||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20181005-150152-0 doi eng 342 23 Lock, Tobias Author aut Autonomy now?! A brief response to Daniel Halberstam Lock, Tobias Verfassungsblog 2015-03-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier I read Daniel Halberstam’s eloquent and erudite defence of Opinion 2/13 with great interest and I agree that (some of) the Court’s arguments can be rationally explained. What struck me about his piece, however, is that while it is centred on the concept of autonomy, he doesn’t seem to regard it necessary to provide us with a definition of it. In order to mount an effective defence of the Court’s position, it would have surely been a good starting point to defend the Court’s conception of autonomy as expressed in the Opinion. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/autonomy-now-a-brief-response-to-daniel-halberstam-2/ raw object