Autonomy now?! A brief response to Daniel Halberstam Lock, Tobias Author aut Text xx# 2015 Verfassungsblog 2015-03-12 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 I read Daniel Halberstam’s eloquent and erudite defence of Opinion 2/13 with great interest and I agree that (some of) the Court’s arguments can be rationally explained. What struck me about his piece, however, is that while it is centred on the concept of autonomy, he doesn’t seem to regard it necessary to provide us with a definition of it. In order to mount an effective defence of the Court’s position, it would have surely been a good starting point to defend the Court’s conception of autonomy as expressed in the Opinion. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Lock, Tobias funded by the government 342 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/autonomy-now-a-brief-response-to-daniel-halberstam-2/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20181005-150152-0 150312 10.17176/20181005-150152-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)