nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20210602-123858-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 210602s2021||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20210602-123858-0 doi eng 342 23 Zalnieriute, Monika Author aut Procedural Fetishism and Mass Surveillance under the ECHR Big Brother Watch v. UK Zalnieriute, Monika Verfassungsblog 2021-06-02 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 25th May 2021, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR ruled in the case Big Brother Watch v. UK that some aspects of the UK’s surveillance regime violated Articles 8 and 10 of the ECHR. Big Brother Watch is the first decision on mass surveillance since the Snowden revelations and sets a standard, grounded in “procedural fetishism”, which endorses the legality of bulk surveillance operations. funded by the government CC BY-SA 4.0 Big Brother Watch v UK Proceduralism surveillance Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/big-b-v-uk/ raw object