nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20191218-174122-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 191218s2019||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20191218-174122-0 doi eng 342 23 Platon, Sébastien Author aut Brexit and the CJEU: why the Opinion of the Court Should be Sought as a Matter of Emergency Platon, Sébastien Verfassungsblog 2019-12-18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the comfortable majority he managed to secure in the Commons, Boris Johnson is now very likely to be able to push through the British Parliament the withdrawal agreement he negotiated with the European Union back in October. Provided that the European Parliament greenlights it quickly enough, it may well come into force by 31 January 2020, deadline of the last extension decision agreed between the EU-27 and the UK. However, one actor of the process seems to have been forgotten: the Court of Justice of the European Union. This could end up being a huge mistake. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 brexit CJEU Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/brexit-and-the-cjeu-why-the-opinion-of-the-court-should-be-sought-as-a-matter-of-emergency/ raw object