nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20190324-203227-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 190312s2019||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20190324-203227-0 doi eng 342 23 Basilien-Gainche, Marie-Laure Author aut Children of Men. Comments on the ECtHR’s Judgment in Khan v. France Basilien-Gainche, Marie-Laure Verfassungsblog 2019-03-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Jamil Khan case illustrates the lack of care unaccompanied foreign minors face in France. As the département of Pas-de-Calais did not do everything they could and should have done to comply with their positive care obligation, the judges of the Strasbourg Court concluded unanimously that France had violated Article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Calais Migration rights of the child Underage migrants Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/children-of-men-comments-on-the-ecthrs-judgment-in-khan-v-france/ raw object