nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20201012-233521-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 201012s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20201012-233521-0 doi eng 342 23 Wyrzykowski, Mirosław Author aut Constitutional Borrowings, Not Hegemony Wyrzykowski, Mirosław Verfassungsblog 2020-10-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The question about the legal hegemony of Germany was raised by comments from lawyers, but also politicians, in connection with the - undoubtedly - controversial decision of the German Constitutional Tribunal in the PSPP case. Armin von Bogdandy’s introduction refers primarily to the problem of the Europeanization of Germany vs. the Germanization of Europe in the context of European integration and Sabino Cassese’s description of “some specific decisions of these more recent EU-specific decisions of the Second Senate of the German Federal Constitutional Court as an attempt to put a German dog leash on European institutions". But it also refers to the past of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the "imposition" of "an enlightened, soft neo-liberalism" on the countries of this region (Bogdan Iancu). In the case of Poland, because Kaczyński’s government seems to be a persecutor against the proceedings which the German jurisprudence provides, "the secret crypt in which the seeds of its spirit will be protected...". (Carl Schmitt). funded by the government CC BY-SA 4.0 Hegemony Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-borrowings-not-hegemony/ raw object