nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20181005-151251-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 150104s2015||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20181005-151251-0 doi eng 342 23 Thym, Daniel Author aut The Missing Link: Direct Effect, CETA/TIIP and Investor-State-Dispute Settlement Thym, Daniel Verfassungsblog 2015-01-04 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier International treaties have rarely received more attention than the proposed free trade deals with the US and Canada. But in the CETA Draft Agreement, which the Commission regards as a template for free trade negotiations with the United States, we come across a final provision of seemingly minor relevance on ‘private rights’, which rejects the applicability of the agreement en passant. This reaffirms that the implications of the free trade deals would be less dramatic than some suggest. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/en-verhinderte-rechtsanwendung-deutsche-gerichte-cetatiip-und-investor-staat-streitigkeiten-2/ raw object