nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20171006-142028 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 131122s2013||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20171006-142028 doi eng 342 23 Scheppele, Kim Lane Author aut EU Commission v. Hungary: The Case for the “Systemic Infringement Action” Scheppele, Kim Lane Verfassungsblog 2013-11-22 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier What can the European Union – and in particular the European Commission – do about Member States that no longer reliably play by the most fundamental European rules? The question is now urgent because several Member States are already posing such challenges. Treaty reform could give the Commission new powers. But can the Commission act without waiting for the long and arduous process of treaty reform to provide new tools? Kim Lane Scheppele proposes a new approach, a simple extension of an existing mechanism: the infringement action. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/eu-commission-v-hungary-the-case-for-the-systemic-infringement-action/ raw object