nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20210216-172149-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 210216s2021||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20210216-172149-0 doi eng 342 23 Montero Regules, Juncal Author aut The Facebook Oversight Board and ‘Context’ Analyzing the first decisions on hate speech Montero Regules, Juncal Verfassungsblog 2021-02-16 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The standout conclusion of the Facebook Oversight Board's two hate speech decisions is that the Board's assessment of content removal heavily relies on context. This is only reasonable, as any speech issue is context-dependent. But the FOB’s context-assessment is incomplete, just as its decisions further highlight Facebook’s content moderation flaws, which likewise fail to consider context. funded by the government CC BY-SA 4.0 Big Tech content moderation Facebook Oversight Board Human Rights Myanmar Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/fob-context/ raw object