nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180118-105106 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180118s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180118-105106 doi eng 342 23 Hussain, Adeel Author aut Four Indian Supreme Court Judges Accuse the Chief Justice of Wrongdoing Hussain, Adeel Verfassungsblog 2018-01-18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The judges should have been more considerate towards the institutional damage their actions have caused. They have hurt the court for decades to come. Institutional reform proves healthy when it comes from the inside; and one would like to think, that four senior judges wield a hefty amount of institutional power to transform the procedural mechanism without having to 'call upon the people' to intervene.This was little more than a political act in a country where politics and the law only function along the simple logic of institutionalising antagonism. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Dipak Misra Indian Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/four-indian-supreme-court-judges-accuse-the-chief-justice-of-wrongdoing/ raw object