<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20190622-232658-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/france-criminalises-research-on-judges/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>France Criminalises Research on Judges</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Langford, Malcolm</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Madsen, Mikael Rask</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2019-06-22</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Convention of Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Freedom of Expression</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Freedom of research</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>judicial independence</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In March, France made a controversial move and became the first country in the world to explicitly ban research on individual judicial behaviour. It is now a criminal offence to ‘evaluate, analyse, compare or predict’ the behaviour of individual judges. The result is a flagrant violation of the freedom of expression, represents an affront to basic values of academic freedom, and disregards basic principles of the rule of law.</dc:description>
</dc>
