nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180627-100327-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180627s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180627-100327-0 doi eng 342 23 Glinavos, Ioannis Author aut In Praise of Limiting Democracy: a Defense of ISDS Glinavos, Ioannis Verfassungsblog 2018-06-27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the UK Parliament debating CETA and the CJEU hearing arguments on the compatibility of EU law with the dispute resolution provisions, investor-state dispute resolution (ISDS) is very much in the news again. Many seem to be concerned about the integrity of the nation state, the ability of the people (within national boundaries) to order and determine their fates. Why should we not view ISDS as a threat to national wellbeing? The reason is that sometimes we need constraints on sovereign discretion. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 CETA isds sovereignty TTIP Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/in-praise-of-limiting-democracy-a-defense-of-isds/ raw object