nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200509-133222-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200509s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200509-133222-0 doi eng 342 23 Marzal, Toni Author aut Is the BVerfG PSPP decision “simply not comprehensible”? A critique of the judgment’s reasoning on proportionality Marzal, Toni Verfassungsblog 2020-05-09 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Upon reading the BVerfG’s bombshell PSPP decision, one cannot but be struck at how little it thinks of the quality of the legal reasoning of the CJEU with regards to the proportionality test. If one is to judge others so harshly, it is wise to make sure that one’s own position is irreproachable. The BVerfG failed to do so. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 BVerfG Proportionality PSPP Ultra Vires Verhältnismäßigkeit Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/is-the-bverfg-pspp-decision-simply-not-comprehensible/ raw object