nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20170406-153416 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 170406s2017||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20170406-153416 doi eng 342 23 van Elsuwege, Peter Author aut Judicial Review of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: Lessons from the Rosneft case van Elsuwege, Peter Verfassungsblog 2017-04-06 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 28 March 2017, the Grand Chamber of the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) decided in a preliminary ruling that the restrictive measures adopted by the Council against Russian undertakings, including oil company Rosneft, are valid. The judgment is of constitutional significance. It clarifies the scope of the CJEU’s jurisdiction with respect to acts adopted in the sphere of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). In particular, it reveals that the EU system of judicial protection fully applies in relation to restrictive measures against natural and legal persons (so-called ‘targeted sanctions’). funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 CJEU Jurisdiction Common Foreign and Security Policy Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/judicial-review-of-the-eus-common-foreign-and-security-policy-lessons-from-the-rosneft-case/ raw object