nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20170814-113100 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 170814s2017||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20170814-113100 doi eng 342 23 McDonough, Paul Author aut Linking Efficiency with Fundamental Rights in the Dublin System: the Case of Mengesteab McDonough, Paul Verfassungsblog 2017-08-14 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The recent CJEU decision "Mengesteab" has two significant consequences for Member States. First, applicants have a right to challenge the procedural steps by which Member States arrive at decisions regarding responsibility for protection applications to insure their fidelity to the rules prescribed in the Dublin Regulation. Second, the duty of Member States to begin assessing which state holds this responsibility engages as soon as the competent authority identified pursuant to article 35(1) of the regulation becomes aware of a request for international protection. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 asylum Dublin III Refugee Protection Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/linking-efficiency-with-fundamental-rights-in-the-dublin-system-the-case-of-mengesteab/ raw object