nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20171204-095317 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 171203s2017||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20171204-095317 doi eng 342 23 Çalı, Başak Author aut Merabishvili v. Georgia: Has the Mountain Given Birth to a Mouse?  Çalı, Başak Verfassungsblog 2017-12-03 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The wait for those of us looking for much needed answers to understand what direction and coherence the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights would give to its nascent Article 18 case law (also known as ‘bad faith’ case law) has ended. A verdict has been reached in Merabashvili v. Georgia Grand Chamber judgment of the European Court of Human Rights.  In a climate of retreat from human rights law and standards under the guise of domestic legalism, answers to the questions of what it means to violate the Convention in bad faith, how we prove it and what responses we owe to bad faith human rights violations have become pressing and urgent. The Grand Chamber gave us answers to the first two questions and passed on the third. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Art. 18 ECHR Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/merabishvili-v-georgia-has-the-mountain-given-birth-to-a-mouse/ raw object