On Doctrinal Contortions and Legal Fetishes A Sceptical Response to Christophe Hillion Scholtes, Julian Author aut Text xx# 2020 Verfassungsblog 2020-04-28 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 There seems to be a belief – especially persistent among some EU legal scholars – that even the largest political problems can be solved through the law. It suggests that any balance of authority and legitimacy between the EU and the Member States is, in fact, a mere technicality of institutional configuration, and a mere doctrinal sleight of hand would suffice to tip the scale of authority one way or another. This belief also seems to be underlying a recent blogpost by Christophe Hillion. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Scholtes, Julian funded by the government Art. 50 TEU Legal Fetishism Rule of Law 342 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/on-doctrinal-contortions-and-legal-fetishes/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20200429-044548-0 200428 10.17176/20200429-044548-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)