nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20190211-230409-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 181115s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20190211-230409-0 doi eng 342 23 Lock, Tobias Author aut On Thin Ice: the Role of the Court of Justice under the Withdrawal Agreement Lock, Tobias Verfassungsblog 2018-11-15 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Her alleged red line of bringing “an end to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice in Britain” was always going to be a problem for Theresa May: After all, the UK’s commitment to comply with certain EU rules would inevitably mean that the ECJ’s interpretations of these rules would have to be binding on the UK. It is thus no surprise that the Withdrawal Agreement provides for the jurisdiction of the ECJ in various places. What is perhaps more of a surprise – and surely a negotiation win for the UK – is the EU’s legally problematic concession of an arbitration mechanism to resolve inter-party disputes over the interpretation of the Withdrawal Agreement. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Arbitration brexit ECJ Jurisdiction Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/on-thin-ice-the-role-of-the-court-of-justice-under-the-withdrawal-agreement/ raw object