On Thin Ice: the Role of the Court of Justice under the Withdrawal Agreement
Lock, Tobias
Author
aut
Text
xx#
2018
Verfassungsblog
2018-11-15
eng
Her alleged red line of bringing “an end to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice in Britain” was always going to be a problem for Theresa May: After all, the UK’s commitment to comply with certain EU rules would inevitably mean that the ECJ’s interpretations of these rules would have to be binding on the UK. It is thus no surprise that the Withdrawal Agreement provides for the jurisdiction of the ECJ in various places. What is perhaps more of a surprise – and surely a negotiation win for the UK – is the EU’s legally problematic concession of an arbitration mechanism to resolve inter-party disputes over the interpretation of the Withdrawal Agreement.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Lock, Tobias
funded by the government
Arbitration
brexit
ECJ Jurisdiction
342
https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/on-thin-ice-the-role-of-the-court-of-justice-under-the-withdrawal-agreement/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.17176/20190211-230409-0
181115
10.17176/20190211-230409-0
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)