<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20201223-172613-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/opposing-an-idle-federal-government/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Opposing an Idle Federal Government</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Bustamante, Thomas</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Peluso Neder Meyer, Emilio</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tirado, Felipe</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2020-12-23</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Austrian Supreme Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>COVID 19</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>federalism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Jair Bolsonaro</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>vaccination</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Last week, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court ruled that mandatory vaccination is constitutional and that states and municipalities may implement vaccination plans if the federal government does not do so. Deciding on five cases altogether, the court strengthened Brazilian federalism in the face of a federal government that remains largely inactive in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic.</dc:description>
</dc>
