nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200713-235309-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200713s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200713-235309-0 doi eng 342 23 Piegsa, Vincent Author aut Patching a gap in the EU’s system of judicial remedies Piegsa, Vincent Verfassungsblog 2020-07-13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the judgment in case C-575/18 P last week, the Court of Justice closed a hole in the EU’s system of judicial protection: it ruled that judicial review of a Commission’s claim of own resources under Regulation 1150/2000 could be obtained through an action for damages for unjust enrichment based on analogous application of Art. 268, 340 (2) TFEU. This case shines a light both on the deficiencies in the EU system of legal remedies and on the approach of the Court of Justice in addressing them. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 European Commission legal remedy Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/patching-a-gap-in-the-eus-system-of-judicial-remedies/ raw object