nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200707-224713-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200707s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200707-224713-0 doi eng 342 23 Hahn, Robert Author aut Practicing Parity Parity Acts in Thuringia, Brandenburg and Beyond Hahn, Robert Verfassungsblog 2020-07-07 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On July 15, the Constitutional Court of the German Land of Thuringia will announce its decision on the fate of Thuringia’s controversial Parity Act, which was passed by Thuringia’s parliament, the Landtag, in 2019. Like Germany’s first Parity Act in Brandenburg, it requires that electoral candidate lists put forward for Landtag elections will have to consist of an equal number of alternating women and men, with the aim of increasing the share of female lawmakers. Several lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of parity legislation have been filed. While not all arguments against the parity acts are convincing, it seems likely that they will be found unconstitutional. Like in other countries, supporters of parity could in this case resort to campaigning for a constitutional amendment. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Constitutional Law Parität parity Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/practicing-parity/ raw object