nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20210601-123800-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 210601s2021||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20210601-123800-0 doi eng 342 23 Klamberg, Mark Author aut Big Brother’s Little, More Dangerous Brother Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden Klamberg, Mark Verfassungsblog 2021-06-01 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 25 May 2021, the European Court of Human Rights issued judgments in two connected cases: Big Brother Watch v. UK and Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden. Both cases involved the review of bulk interception of communications, described by its critics as “mass surveillance”. The Swedish example has attracted less criticism from the ECtHR than the UK, and can be construed as a model law. However, the Swedish legislation is highly opaque and the ECtHR's scrutiny has fallen short. funded by the government CC BY-SA 4.0 Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden ECtHR surveillance Sweden Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/raettvisa/ raw object