nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180912-152934-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180912s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180912-152934-0 doi eng 342 23 Lang, Andrej Author aut Regime Collision between EU Law and Investment Law: New Developments in the Vattenfall Case Lang, Andrej Verfassungsblog 2018-09-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier EU law and international investment law are on collision course. The bone of contention is which court shall decide intra-EU investor-state disputes. While the ECJ indicated in its Achmea judgment that only itself and the domestic courts of the member states may decide such disputes, the Investment Tribunal in the Vattenfall case has now decided in the context of the Energy Charter Treaty that Achmea does not preclude its jurisdiction. How did this clash of courts arise and how can it be resolved? funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ECJ Jurisdiction Investment Tribunals Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/regime-collision-between-eu-law-and-investment-law-new-developments-in-the-vattenfall-case/ raw object