Regime Collision between EU Law and Investment Law: New Developments in the Vattenfall Case
Lang, Andrej
Author
aut
Text
xx#
2018
Verfassungsblog
2018-09-12
eng
EU law and international investment law are on collision course. The bone of contention is which court shall decide intra-EU investor-state disputes. While the ECJ indicated in its Achmea judgment that only itself and the domestic courts of the member states may decide such disputes, the Investment Tribunal in the Vattenfall case has now decided in the context of the Energy Charter Treaty that Achmea does not preclude its jurisdiction. How did this clash of courts arise and how can it be resolved?
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Lang, Andrej
funded by the government
ECJ Jurisdiction
Investment Tribunals
342
https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/regime-collision-between-eu-law-and-investment-law-new-developments-in-the-vattenfall-case/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.17176/20180912-152934-0
180912
10.17176/20180912-152934-0
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)