<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20181111-122701-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/responding-to-the-nation-state-law-norms-and-narratives-of-solidarity-in-israeli-constitutional-law/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Responding to the Nation-State Law: Norms and Narratives of Solidarity in Israeli Constitutional Law</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Loevy, Karin</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2018-11-10</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Israel und besetzte Gebiete</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Israel's Nation-State Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>solidarity</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The Nation-State Law saga revealed in Israel’s constitutional politics three constitutional narratives while only two are conventionally recognized. . This third narrative is usually disregarded by the Israeli Jewish public and perceived as marginal or even as an existential threat. But in the debates about the Nation-State Law the force of this narrative became apparent and it is about time to shed light on the presence and the value of this alternative narrative.</dc:description>
</dc>
