<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170330-143224</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/schrems-v-commissioner-a-biblical-parable-of-judicial-power-2/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Schrems v. Commissioner: A Biblical Parable of Judicial Power</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Miller, Russell A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2015-10-07</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CJEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>data protection</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Judicial restraint</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Political Rule of Law Enforcement</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>privacy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>security</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>surveillance</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>We might celebrate the Court’s decision in Case C-362/14 as an improbable victory of good (data-privacy) over evil (consumer and intelligence data abuses). But I want to offer some words of caution about god-like judicial power.</dc:description>
</dc>
