That Depends
On Eleanor Sharpston’s Position as AG, Legal Complexities and Effective Interim Proceedings
Wolfsteller, René
Author
aut
Text
xx#
2020
Verfassungsblog
2020-09-15
eng
The controversial debate about Eleanor Sharpston’s position as Advocate General has raised a lot of questions: political as well as legal. Many of the legal questions have not been decided by the Courts, the law is ambiguous, and the circumstances with one Member leaving the European Union are unprecedented. And yet, the Court of Justice treated those questions as if the answers were straightforward and clear-cut. In doing so, the Court seems to have ignored the complexity of the legal questions and thereby undercut the effectiveness of the proceedings for interim measures.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Wolfsteller, René
funded by the government
AG Sharpston
brexit
Court of Justice
interim measures
Rantos
342
https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/that-depends/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.17176/20200916-211340-0
200915
10.17176/20200916-211340-0
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)