<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20161107-103743</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-article-50-litigation-and-the-court-of-justice-why-the-supreme-court-must-refer/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Article 50 Litigation and the Court of Justice: Why the Supreme Court must refer</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Lang, Richard</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2016-11-06</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Art. 50 TEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>brexit</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Referral to the ECJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK Supreme Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Article 50 TEU says that member states decide to withdraw from the Union "according to their own constitutional requirements". It is for the Luxembourg Court to clarify what this means. Thus, in the current case on Brexit the UK Supreme Court is obliged to refer to the European Court of Justice. One could argue that this should never have been made a Union problem. But it was, and, like it or not, that makes it the Court of Justice’s problem too.</dc:description>
</dc>
