<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170313-105551</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-cjeu-on-humanitarian-visa-discovering-un-chartered-waters-of-eu-law/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The CJEU on Humanitarian Visa: Discovering ‘Un-Chartered’ Waters of EU Law</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Ovádek, Michal</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2017-03-13</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Akerberg Fransson</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Charter of Fundamental Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Refugee Protection</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>refugees</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Visa</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Limiting the scope of EU law vis-à-vis national legislative measures is one thing but creating un-Chartered territory in EU law is another. It is understandable why the Court would want to stay away from the currently toxic migration politics. But it is worrying that it is willing to further limit the scope of the Charter when it might be needed the most.</dc:description>
</dc>
