nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20190517-144225-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 190415s2019||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20190517-144225-0 doi eng 342 23 Lübbe, Anna Author aut The CJEU (Unintentionally) Opens New Avenues of “Free Choice” in Asylum Law Lübbe, Anna Verfassungsblog 2019-04-15 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the CJEU judgment H & R of 2 April 2019, the never-ending story of clarifying the preconditions for Dublin transfers took a turn that will again entail needs for clarification. The CJEU’s interpretation was essentially motivated by the aim to keep, or render, the Dublin system efficient and to lessen the time and effort involved in handling secondary migrations. Was it successful? funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 asylum Dublin III Dublin transfer Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-cjeu-unintentionally-opens-new-avenues-of-free-choice-in-asylum-law/ raw object