The Death of Law and Equity A Comment on Two COVID Cases Driesen, David M. Author aut Text xx# 2022 Verfassungsblog 2022-01-19 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 On the same day, the U.S. Supreme Court issued decisions governing requests for emergency stays of two rules protecting Americans from COVID 19. Both rules relied on very similar statutory language, which clearly authorized protection from threats to health. Both of them presented strikingly bad cases for emergency stays. Yet, the Court granted an emergency stay in one of these cases and denied it in the other. These decisions suggest that the Court applies judicial discretion unguided by law or traditional equitable considerations governing treatment of politically controversial regulatory cases. CC BY-SA 4.0 Driesen, David M. funded by the government COVID 19 health protection major questions doctrine US Supreme Court 342 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-death-of-law-and-equity/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20220119-184227-0 220119 10.17176/20220119-184227-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)