<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170330-154522</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-delvigne-judgment-of-the-cjeu-going-boldly-but-perhaps-not-boldly-enough/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Delvigne judgment and the European franchise: going boldly… but perhaps not boldly enough</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Platon, Sébastien</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>ger</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2015-10-24</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Delvigne</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU citizen rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European fundamental rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>rottmann</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Zambrano</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In it's recent "Delvigne" decision, the Court took a rather bold stance on the material scope of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament. I will however also argue that, in some respect, this stance was not bold enough.</dc:description>
</dc>
