nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20211223-124315-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 211223s2021||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20211223-124315-0 doi eng 342 23 Avril, Lola Author aut The EU and its ‘Exes’ Probing the Limits of Revolving Door Rules Avril, Lola Verfassungsblog 2021-12-23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In September 2021, MEPs voted in favour of a new EU Ethics body to oversee movements of personnel between the public and the private sector and proposed an interinstitutional agreement to this end. Replacing the current Independent Ethical Committee, the new body would be responsible for proposing and advising Commissioners, MEPs and staff of the institutions on ethics rules. The new Ethics Body, however, is not the regulatory unicorn many are hoping for. The gaps and ineffectiveness of EU policies to address revolving door moves stem from a limited understanding of the issue, which in turn is a result of lack of research and interest. The EU cannot devise better policies unless more is known about the phenomenon. funded by the government CC BY-SA 4.0 code of conduct EU ethics body revolving doors Korkea-aho, Emilia Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-eu-and-its-exes/ raw object