nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180605-203917-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180605s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180605-203917-0 doi eng 342 23 Belavusau, Uladzislau Author aut The Federal Rainbow Dream: On Free Movement of Gay Spouses under EU Law Belavusau, Uladzislau Verfassungsblog 2018-06-05 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After a pretty disappointing and self-contradictory judgement on the wedding cakes delivered yesterday by the US Supreme Court, the CJEU came up today with the long-awaited decision in the Coman case – putting a thick full stop on a long debate about the interpretation of the term ‘spouses’ under the EU Free Movement Directive. In short, the Court held that the term does cover spouses of the same sex moving to an EU Member State where a gay marriage remains unrecognized. This simple YES is a huge step forward in federalizing the EU constitutional space in a time of multiple crises. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Discrimination of Sexual Orientation Right to Family Life Same Sex Marriage Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-federal-rainbow-dream-on-free-movement-of-gay-spouses-under-eu-law/ raw object