nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20190925-232711-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 190925s2019||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20190925-232711-0 doi eng 342 23 Gstrein, Oskar J. Author aut The Judgment That Will Be Forgotten How the ECJ Missed an Opportunity in Google vs CNIL (C-507/17) Gstrein, Oskar J. Verfassungsblog 2019-09-25 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On September 24 2019, the ECJ delivered its judgment in Google vs CNIL (C-517/17) which was expected to clarify the territorial scope of the ‘right to be forgotten’. In fact, the ECJ’s decision is disappointing in several respects. The Court does not only open the door to fragmentation in European data protection law but also fails to further develop the protection of individual rights in the digital age. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 data protection European Integration Right to be Forgotten Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-judgment-that-will-be-forgotten/ raw object