nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20160314-100519 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 160312s2016||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20160314-100519 doi eng 342 23 Orgad, Liav Author aut The Law of Majorities: A Rejoinder Orgad, Liav Verfassungsblog 2016-03-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This has been an instructive discussion that has shed light on some of the most pressing issues of our time. Overall, there is an agreement on the existence of the social entity of the “majority group,” although less on the criteria to identify a majority. Some interesting disagreements are found on the empirical question – whether the majority culture is indeed “needy” (how much, in which field, etc.) – and on the normative question: whether a culturally needy majority should be granted a right to defend its constitutional identity in the immigration context. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Cultural Rights Liberal Theory Majority Multilateralism Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-law-of-majorities-a-rejoinder/ raw object