nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20210712-140121-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 210712s2021||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20210712-140121-0 doi eng 342 23 Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas Author aut The Limits of Indirect Deterrence of Asylum Seekers Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas Verfassungsblog 2021-07-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The ECtHR judgment M.A. v. Denmark is significant for several reasons. Firstly, because it adds to an already growing international criticism of Denmark’s asylum and immigration policy. Secondly, because the judgment helps clarify the Court’s position on an issue, family reunification for refugees, where case law has hitherto been somewhat ambiguous, and where several European States have introduced new restrictions since 2015. Third, and finally, the judgment represents – to paraphrase Harold Koh - another “way station…in the complex enforcement” of migrant and refugee rights by international human rights institutions. funded by the government The ECtHR Ruling M.A. v. Denmark asylum ECtHR Family unification Refugee Protection Madsen, Mikael Rask Author aut Palmer Olsen, Henrik Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-limits-of-indirect-deterrence-of-asylum-seekers/ raw object