The Limits of Indirect Deterrence of Asylum Seekers Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas Author aut Madsen, Mikael Rask Author aut Palmer Olsen, Henrik Author aut Text xx# 2021 Verfassungsblog 2021-07-12 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 The ECtHR judgment M.A. v. Denmark is significant for several reasons. Firstly, because it adds to an already growing international criticism of Denmark’s asylum and immigration policy. Secondly, because the judgment helps clarify the Court’s position on an issue, family reunification for refugees, where case law has hitherto been somewhat ambiguous, and where several European States have introduced new restrictions since 2015. Third, and finally, the judgment represents – to paraphrase Harold Koh - another “way station…in the complex enforcement” of migrant and refugee rights by international human rights institutions. The ECtHR Ruling M.A. v. Denmark Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas funded by the government asylum ECtHR Family unification Refugee Protection 342 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-limits-of-indirect-deterrence-of-asylum-seekers/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20210712-140121-0 210712 10.17176/20210712-140121-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)