<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170203-101242</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-miller-decision-legal-constitutionalism-ends-not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Miller decision: Legal constitutionalism ends not with a bang, but a whimper</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>O'Neill, Aidan</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2017-02-03</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>brexit</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Devolution</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Miller v. Secretary of State</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Scotland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK Supreme Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Miller was essentially a case which was argued before, and decided by, the court on the basis of the English Imperial constitutional tradition forged in the Victorian age.  This judgment has made the political constitution of the devolved United Kingdom as a whole more unstable, more brittle, more fragile and more likely to break-up precisely because it denies the devolved nations’ institutions any legal right to participate in the Brexit process.</dc:description>
</dc>
