The Pechstein case: Transnational constitutionalism in inaction at the Bundesgerichtshof
Duval, Antoine
Author
aut
Text
xx#
2016
Verfassungsblog
2016-06-10
eng
How independent is the Court of Arbitration for Sport, or the international sport governing bodies (SGB) in general? This question was at the heart of the Pechstein case before the German Federal Court (BGH). The BGH considers that the CAS is a true arbitral tribunal in the sense of German civil procedural law and that it is not structurally imbalanced in favour of the SGBs. In this blog post, I will aim at critically unpacking and deconstructing the four arguments the decision is based on, one by one.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Duval, Antoine
funded by the government
Arbitration
dispute settlement
Pechstein
Sport Law
342
https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-pechstein-case-transnational-constitutionalism-in-inaction-at-the-bundesgerichtshof/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.17176/20160610-093528
160610
10.17176/20160610-093528
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)