<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170220-104445</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-proposed-amendment-of-the-comitology-regulation-a-constitutional-perspective/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Proposed Amendment of the Comitology Regulation – A Constitutional Perspective</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Chamon, Merijn</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2017-02-19</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Comitology</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU Commission</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>GMOs</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Treaty of Lisbon</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On Valentine’s day, the European Commission proposed “four targeted amendments” to the Comitology Regulation. In this blogpost it will be argued that while the proposal contains interesting elements, it is largely flawed from an institutional and constitutional point of view.</dc:description>
</dc>
