nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20170130-094500 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 170128s2017||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20170130-094500 doi eng 342 23 Bassini, Marco Author aut The Taricco Decision: A Last Attempt to Avoid a Clash between EU Law and the Italian Constitution Bassini, Marco Verfassungsblog 2017-01-28 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Is Italy obliged by EU law to pursue criminal acts longer than provided by Italian law? This question might cause a fundamental clash between the Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. Unlike the CJEU, the Italian Constitutional Court interprets a retroactive suspension of the limitation period as a matter of principle of legality, and thereby as a matter of a core principle of Italian constitutional law. By referring the case to the CJEU, the Italian Constitutional Court gives the European Court a chance to revisit its jurisdiction while avoiding the identity language of the German Constitutional Court - good news for cooperative constitutionalism in Europe. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Constitutional Identity Criminal Law Italian Constitutional Court Taricco Pollicino, Oreste Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-taricco-decision-a-last-attempt-to-avoid-a-clash-between-eu-law-and-the-italian-constitution/ raw object