The Taricco Decision: A Last Attempt to Avoid a Clash between EU Law and the Italian Constitution Bassini, Marco Author aut Pollicino, Oreste Author aut Text xx# 2017 Verfassungsblog 2017-01-28 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 Is Italy obliged by EU law to pursue criminal acts longer than provided by Italian law? This question might cause a fundamental clash between the Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. Unlike the CJEU, the Italian Constitutional Court interprets a retroactive suspension of the limitation period as a matter of principle of legality, and thereby as a matter of a core principle of Italian constitutional law. By referring the case to the CJEU, the Italian Constitutional Court gives the European Court a chance to revisit its jurisdiction while avoiding the identity language of the German Constitutional Court - good news for cooperative constitutionalism in Europe. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Bassini, Marco funded by the government Constitutional Identity Criminal Law Italian Constitutional Court Taricco 342 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/the-taricco-decision-a-last-attempt-to-avoid-a-clash-between-eu-law-and-the-italian-constitution/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20170130-094500 170128 10.17176/20170130-094500 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)