<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Towards a European Court of Fundamental Rights</title>
    <subTitle>How the European Court of Justice Becomes the Last Instance of Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Europe</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal" usage="primary">
    <namePart>Tuchtfeld, Erik</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource/>
  <genre authority="rdacontent">Text</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx#</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2020</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo eventType="publisher">
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text"/>
    </place>
    <publisher>Verfassungsblog</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2020-10-19</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marccategory">electronic resource</form>
    <form authority="marcsmd">remote</form>
    <form type="media" authority="rdamedia">Computermedien</form>
    <form type="carrier" authority="rdacarrier">Online-Ressource</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract displayLabel="Summary">With its judgments on bulk data retention issued at the beginning of this month, the European Court of Justice has entitled itself to examine virtually all surveillance measures in the digital sphere. In doing so, it has once more clarified its positioning as the decisive Fundamental Rights Court in Europe. In the midst of the ultra vires-storm caused by the PSPP-judgement of the Bundesverfassungsgericht – and questions arising with regard to German Legal Hegemony in Europe – a true shift of power to the ECJ can be spotted which is, surprisingly, supported by the national constitutional courts.</abstract>
  <accessCondition type="use and reproduction">CC BY-SA 4.0</accessCondition>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Tuchtfeld, Erik</note>
  <note type="funding">funded by the government</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>Anwendungsvorrang</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>ECJ</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>European Charter of Fundamental Rights</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>European Court of Human Rights</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Melloni</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>National Security</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>PSPP</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Vorratsdatenspeicherung</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">342</classification>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="raw object" usage="primary display">https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/towards-a-european-court-of-fundamental-rights/</url>
  </location>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Verfassungsblog</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <identifier type="issn">2366-7044</identifier>
    <name>
      <namePart>Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="doi">10.17176/20201019-233346-0</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">201019</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DE-Verfassungsblog">10.17176/20201019-233346-0</recordIdentifier>
    <recordOrigin>Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
				(Revision 1.140 20200717)</recordOrigin>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
