nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200616-003807-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200615s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200616-003807-0 doi eng 342 23 Jóźwicki, Władysław Author aut Ultra vires and constitutional identity control – apples and oranges or two drops of water? Some remarks on the possible role of the New Mixed Chamber of the Court of Justice in the context of the “sequential” model of adjudication on art. 4(2) TEU Jóźwicki, Władysław Verfassungsblog 2020-06-15 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The PSPP decision raised the question of how to deal with competence and jurisdictional conflicts in the EU. Once suggestion is to install a Mixed Appeal Chamber of the CJEU. Apart from ultra vires control, the New Chamber could also engage in constitutional identity review of EU law. In order to do that I will propose, what I call, the “sequential” model of adjudication on Art. 4(2) TEU, which in my opinion can be applied in the current legal setting, but which could be potentially complemented with the establishment of the new chamber. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 BVerfG ECJ Mixed Grand Chamber PSPP Ultra Vires Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/ultra-vires-and-constitutional-identity-control-apples-and-oranges-or-two-drops-of-water/ raw object